NaNoWriMo 2018

This post is predominantly about the fact that November is right around the corner, and with it, NaNo 2018. It’s been 9 years since I last “won” at NaNoWriMo, but I’m going to be foolhardy enough to try it again this year.

I’ve been lately feeling the pull stronger than normal to write something. To create something. I feel that those urges, those pulls, should be answered, and can be answered easily enough. But, the satisfaction of them requires that we do a bit of work.

Work in the form of sitting our butts in the chairs and doing the writing.  At least in the case of the urge to create some form of written word work. The same could be said for other creative forms. Feel the urge to paint?  You’ve got to apply the paintbrush to canvas. Want to create a finely crafted rocking chair?  You’ve got to start cutting the wood.

Whatever your creative outlet, when the urge calls, answering it is the easiest way to satisfaction. And sanity, I believe. Those pulls. Those urges. Unanswered, I believe they erode away at the strings that hold us together.

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy.

Commence NaNoWriMo!

Goodness!  Did you look at the date today?  November is RIGHT THERE!  And, with November, another NaNoWriMo!

Are you participating this year?  After barely making it a week in 2008, winning in 2009, and then failing in 2010, I’m looking to continue the pattern with a win in 2011.  I’m changing it up a little bit this year, however.  Instead of one long work, I’m setting the goal of 10 shorts with a combined total of 50,000 words or more.  With an average of 5,000 words each, I’m hoping it might make it a bit easier to accomplish the 50,000 word goal.  It sure makes it sound easier.  I only have to do 10, 5,000 word short stories!

I think, technically, the purists will hang me for not sticking to the letter of the law and doing one long work, but if you think about it, 10 shorts is more than enough for a collection, and a collection is one long work.  Sorta.  I see it as bending the rules rather than breaking them.  Besides, the goal is to write.  And, if that’s how I get it done, then so be it.

So?  Spill it!  What are you planning to write for NaNoWriMo?

5 Minutes Alone

Writing is as much a habit as it is anything else.  You’ve got to sit down at your computer, or with your pad and pen, and write if you want to get any writing done.  Don’t do that, and you’ll end up with nothing completed, and most of your best ideas forgotten into the ether.  But, if you’ve ever participated in something like NaNoWriMo, where you have to consistently sit down and write for an hour or more a day, you know that it can also be a chore to sit that long and churn out text.

The majority of that feeling is coming from the fact that you don’t normally do it.  Then you decide to torture yourself a little and do it for 30 days straight.  Ouch, right?  Well, there’s a fix to that.  You have to develop the habit of writing.  I’m as guilty of not doing this as anyone else out there.  Sitting down for an hour or two at a time is just hard to do.  Especially when you have to carve that time out of some other activity that you’ve been doing for some time.  That other activity is a stronger habit, and is easier to do, so it wins.

Here’s how I think you can break that problem’s back.  5 minutes alone.  We can all carve 5 minutes out of our schedule.  Find 5 minutes, and do nothing but write for those 5 minutes.  You can do more, if you find yourself so inclined, but you must do 5 minutes.  Do that for a month, maybe two.  You’ll find that, by the end, those 5 minutes are pretty easy to come by.  And you’ll also find that you’ve got a heck of a lot of text to work with as a result.

Each month, increase the required time by 5 minutes.  By the end of a year, you’ll be doing an hour straight.  Probably more.  In short, you’ll have developed a habit.

p.s. extra bonus points for naming the band who’s song title I borrowed for this post.

p.p.s. bonus points are worth nothing.

p.p.s. Just in case you can’t figure it out: here

Who Decides?

Who decides which manuscripts should be published?  From a purely technical standpoint, the current state of publishing is that a manuscript must first be picked up by an agent, then that agent must find a publisher to pick it up.  It’s a double gated system.  The manuscript must be decided upon at each gate in order to advance on to being published.  But, that’s all changing, isn’t it.

It used to be so much harder to go the self published route.  Anybody could write a book, and take it to a printer.  But, getting any sort of distribution was extremely difficult.  The author would have to take up the car salesman mantra and knock on every door of every bookstore they could reach in hopes that one or two of them might agree to find a bit of shelf space in the store for the authors book.  Now, it can be as simple as a bit of formatting and a few button clicks, and you’ve managed to upload your book onto the shelves of one of the largest bookstores in the world.  Shelf space is cheaper now.  Without the limits of a physical shelf, a bookstore can hold an unlimited number of digital books.  As a result, the barrier to entry has lowered.  Self publishing is, suddenly, very easy to do.

I, personally, am still on the fence.  I’m attracted to the lack of barrier that the self-publishing route has.  But, I’m also attracted to the gates of the agent/publishing house route.  Gates mean exclusivity.  If you can get through those gates, you join a limited group of people.  But, if you sell enough books, does it matter which route you went?  Not really.

I noticed a post by someone over at Bookends, LLC‘s blog.  It went like this:

Just because friends, family, and coworkers tell you to write a book doesn’t mean it’s a book that should be published.

As I read it, a part of me reached for my pitchfork.  My hackles went up.  And I clicked through to see how badly they’d been skewered in the comments.  And, it turns out, they weren’t.  A majority of the comments are positive.  There’s a few that took up the other side though.  And it’s those I agree with most.  Who are they to decide whether “it’s a book that should be published” or not?  Did I miss the memo that announced them as supreme deciders of publish-ability?

Yes, agents and publishers know a great deal more about the market that you or I do.  Yes, some of them are very, very good at their jobs.  But, I also think back to how many stories we’ve all heard about the manuscript that got rejected 30 or 40 times before someone took it and then it hit the bestseller list.  The real truth is that not everyone likes what everyone else does.  Thank goodness, or there wouldn’t be any market for certain authors.  I’ve personally read (or tried to read) two books this year alone that I thought were absolutely terrible.  These weren’t random books I picked out of the bargain bin on the Kindle store.  These were bestsellers.  Classics by some peoples standards.  I didn’t even finish one of them.  I thought they were that bad.  If I had been the agent that either had come to, or the publisher, I would have rejected them.

If agents and publishers can miss good books, and put bad books through, what right do they have determining which manuscripts go forward?

If your friends, family, and coworkers tell you to write a book, write it.  That’s first.  Just write it.  Then, take it and get an editor to look it over.  Get some beta readers to read it through.  Edit it.  Send it to an editor again.  Once you’re darn well sure it’s ready to go, decide whether you want to go through the traditional publishing route or not.  Send it to an agent, or not.  But, send it somewhere.

I said I was on the fence earlier in this post.  But, I’m leaning towards the self publishing side more and more each day.  Who decides whether a book is any good or not?  In the end, it’s the readers.  And, if the readers are the ones who decide, why are we wasting our time trying to get through gates instead of putting out the best book we can and letting the readers decide.


Heinlein’s Business Rules

I’ve never heard of Heinlein’s Business Rules before.  Thankfully, I read The Passive Voice, who pointed to this post by Dean Wesley Smith, wherein he mentions aforementioned rules in a post that really should be read in full by anyone who fancies themselves a writer. I mean that.  Click on Dean’s name and go read that post. What are Heinlein’s Business Rules, you might ask?

Here they are (with small additions from Smith):

His rules go simply:

1) You must write.
2) You must finish what you write.
3) You must not rewrite unless to editorial demand.
4) You must mail your work to someone who can buy it.
5) You must keep the work in the mail until someone buys it.

Those rules do seem so simple, and yet are so hard to follow at times. They set out a simple practice schedule and a clear process of what to do with your practice sessions when finished. But for this chapter, note rule #3. Harlan Ellison added to rule #3. “You must not rewrite unless to editorial demand.” Harlan addition: And then only if you agree.

And, of course, if you indie publish, substitute “publish” in #4  for “mail” and let reader’s buy it. And then for #5 just keep it for sale.

An interesting take on things.  And it goes against every fiber of your being, if you’re a aspiring writer.  Mostly because every fiber of your being has had the edit, edit, edit, rewrite, rewrite, proof, proof, edit, rewrite, submit, repeat mantra beat into your head at every turn by everyone.  Will Heinlein’s rules work for everyone?  Certainly not.  But, I’d be willing to bet that a large majority of you would find they work just fine. Maybe you should give it a try.




Good Interview with Patrick Rothfuss

The guys over at Adventures in Sci-Fi Publishing posted a really good interview with Name of the Wind author Patrick Rothfuss a few days back.  I just got around to finding the time to listen to it.

AISFP interview with Patrick Rothfuss

I’ve never heard Rothfuss speak before, and I have to admit that his voice is completely different from that which I had given him in my mind.  In my mind, he spoke with a deep, well of a voice like that of Hagrid in the Harry Potter movies.  But, really, he sounds like a pretty normal guy.  Despite his appearance. 😉

I’m dead-smack in the middle of reading his latest novel, The Wise Mans Fear, so it was nice to also not have any spoilers in the interview.

Go, listen.  But, be warned, it’s a little over an hour long.  Good for commuting.

Elizabeth Gilbert on Creativity

Elizabeth Gilbert, who you may know as the author of Eat, Pray, Love, has a wonderful talk being featured on the TEDtalks website about nurturing creativity.

It’s an incredibly interesting take on things.  Although there are some who have such goliath followerships that we fail to ever really see them fail (King and Patterson come to mind), there are many of us who will (or already have) had failings.  It’s just important to remember that, if you are doing what you are truly meant to do, we must overlook those failings and go on with our work.

Jeremy Shipp’s Writing Fiction Bootcamp

If you’re an aspiring writer, you might want to check this out.  It always pays to learn a little something more about your craft.  And whether you think of Jeremy Shipp as your peer or as your better, you probably won’t find a fiction class of this caliber, for this price, anywhere else.  A little info about the class:

This fun, intensive 8-week course is perfect for writers who want to hone their craft and polish their work for publication. Through writing exercises, lectures, and feedback from your instructor and fellow classmates, you will grow as an author and refine your own unique voice and style. After you finish the course, your muse will thank you with a dinner and a movie.

The course will consist of the following activities:

-Read lectures spawned by your instructor’s twisted mind that explore the craft and business of writing
-Write one short story
-Write one first chapter of a novel
-Present your work for critique by instructor and classmates
-Rewrite the story and chapter
-Complete imaginative and challenging writing exercises every week, which will be critiqued by your instructor

The class is entirely virtual, and has no set schedule within the time frame, so it fits around your schedule.  The class runs from January 3rd through February 28th.  A full eight weeks!

I’m sure by now, you’re wondering how much it is.  And that’s where the story gets really good.  The whole shebang is only $149.  Like I said, you’ll have a hard time buying a fraction of this sort of thing for that money elsewhere.

If you’re interested in the class, you can drop Jeremy an email at bizarrobytes [@] gmail [dot] com

Scrivener for Windows Beta Available

Literature and Latte, the folks who’ve been giving us Scrivener for Mac for the last who knows how many years (I’m a PC, so I haven’t paid any attention) released their beta version of Scrivener for Windows today.  It’s basically Scrivener 1.0 for Mac ported over for Windows.  I’m downloading it now.

If you’d like to give it a try, you can check out the info on the Scrivener for Windows page, or you can go directly to the download link.

They’ve also released the trial version of the newest Scrivener for Mac 2.0.  All of this is scheduled particularly for the beginning of Nanowrimo next week.  This year, I’m using Scrivener for Windows for NanoWrimo!  (As long as it isn’t horribly buggy, that is.)

Stephen King Fortune Interview

Stephen King (one of my favorites) recently did an interview with Fortune Magazine.  Here’s some video of it:

Some interesting insights. A couple of things I caught: He has a set schedule where he writes each and every day. He writes for at least 3 hours a day.

And the best quote from the interview: “If you drop a book into the toilet, you can fish it out and dry it off and read it. If you drop your Kindle in the toilet, you’re done.”